Review

(redirected from reviewer)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to reviewer: Book reviewer

Review

To reexamine judicially or administratively; a judicial reconsideration for purposes of correction, for example, the examination of a case by an appellate court.

A bill of review is a proceeding in Equity instituted for the purpose of reversing or correcting the prior judgment of the trial court after the judgment has become final.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

review

n. the judicial consideration of a lower court judgment by an appellate court, determining if there were legal errors sufficient to require reversal. The process requires notice of appeal, obtaining a transcript of the trial or hearing at the trial level, obtaining all the pleadings and other documents filed in the original trial, preparation of briefs citing precedents and arguing that there was reversible error. Then the respondent (winner at the trial court) may file a responsive brief, and the appellant (the one appealing the decision) has the chance to file a brief in response to the respondent. The next step is oral argument (if allowed) before the appellate court. Appeals on procedural issues normally do not include oral argument. If the appellate court denies the appeal a rehearing may be requested, but is seldom granted. (See: reversible error, reversal, appeal, appellate court)

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.

REVIEW, practice. A second examination of a matter. For example, by the laws of Pennsylvania, the courts having jurisdiction of the subject may grant an order for a view of a proposed road; the viewers make a report, which when confirmed by the court would authorize the laying out of the same. After this, by statutory provision, the parties may apply for a review, or second examination; and the last viewers may make a different report. For the practice of reviews in chancery, the reader is referred to Bill of Review, and the cases there cited.

A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
References in periodicals archive ?
2 Reviewer's information/identification###34###82.9###7###17###7.9###0.00001
First and foremost, the peer review process is a collaboration between the author(s) and the reviewers).
While it may seem like "delivering superior customer service" is not the key point of the message that ends our participation in the reviewer's rhetoric, it is crucial to understand how persistent negative reviewers can affect morale and deplete time and energy from our teams-particularly when our incredibly valued onsite associates are involved.
To frame reviewer responses, I rely on a conceptual model developed by Carole L.
Georgie Porgy Cafe, Walton Breck Road Reviewer Emma H said: "Cheap prices, friendly staff and tasty food!
A limitation of asking scientists who are early in their careers (e.g., postdocs) to review manuscripts is that many of them make overly harsh recommendations that they justify based on minor errors by the authors or even the reviewer's misinterpreting their strongly held opinions as facts.
It was fascinating to observe communication with authors and reviewers, quick and timely response through emails and phone calls and most important pivotal role of coordination, leadership and team work.
Peer review is the process of reviewing and critiquing a manuscript by several (usually two or three) knowledgeable professionals known as peer reviewers (Doncliff, 2016).
Amazon Vine reviewers are only allowed to join the program after having written a certain number of reviews which have been marked as helpful by customers.
CARA MIA 79 WATERLOO ROAD In poll position at the time of writing is the popular Italian restaurant, which reviewers praise for serving great food at good prices.