(redirected from sophist)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to sophist: Socrates, Plato, Protagoras
References in periodicals archive ?
As Bartlett observes, while in the Protagoras the sophist cleans up his teaching for the sake of attracting students, in the Theaetetus Socrates rehabilitates and perhaps improves on Protagoras' views for the sake of clarifying a question central to his own life: "What is knowledge?
The inspiration Hu found in the Sophists is not indicative of Hu's desire to westernize China.
The book can be divided into three parts, mirroring the parts of the Sophist itself.
The Visitor violates this rule in the Sophist when he separates the art of contradiction ([TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]) into skilled ([TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]) and unskilled ([TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]) forms of arguing (Sph 225c).
14) In a footnote to the introduction of the collected works of rhetorician Isocrates (436--338BCE), George Norlin writes: "The term sophist had not until later times any invidious associations.
Prodicos considered himself a nature philosopher and a sophist, and in his opinion the good and the bad are relative; what it is good for one, it is bad for the other one and vice versa.
Hutchinson has suggested, the roots of this dispute reach back at least as far as the sophist Protagoras (30).
Sophist went on to land a Grade Three at Fairyhouse a week later, beating Financial Reward, Victoria Night and Celtic Warrior with two more of Lounaos' rivals today further behind.
Lounaos (9-10), winner of the November Handicap on the level at Leopardstown earlier this month, stayed on well to account for Sophist by three lengths.
In a world where most architectural publishing is unimaginative and kowtows to the convoluted architecturalstar-system and the main protagonists sophist ideas, Princeton are to be applauded for the breadth of their vision in publishing this book.
sophist and rhetorician known as Gorgias wrote the following about opportunity: "One requires two virtues, the first is readiness to undertake and endure risk, and the second is the skillful knowledge on how to manage it.
McComisky introduces the book by identifying four critical approaches to studying the sophists: one that "takes Plato at his word, disparaging the sophists as greedy cheaters"; a second that "accept[s] what Plato says about the sophists" but that revalues the doctrines Plato ascribes to them; a third that dismisses Plato's "misrepresentation of the sophists," focusing on sophistic texts themselves in order to "discover common threads" among them; and a fourth that disregards Plato's "misrepresentations," examines the texts themselves, and seeks to understand "the unique contributions of each individual sophist in the context of Pre-Socratic thought" (p.