with justification

See: for cause
References in periodicals archive ?
Instead, even if the correct justifying reasons are indeterminate, the state acts with justification provided it acts on the basis of epistemically justified, inconclusive, but determinate justifying reasons.
I take no stand on which analysis is to be preferred, although my suspicion is that they are, at bottom, not so very different: justifications are conduct rules, and belong to the theory of crime, precisely because somebody who acts with justification does nothing wrong.
Nonetheless, although the distinction between justification and excuse is reasonable enough as a point of departure it leaves important questions unanswered, largely because it is not clear what facts are relevant to determining when an individual should be regarded as having acted with justification and when an individual should merely be excused for something that she did.
Next, I propose to show that justification and deification are part of a two-step process of salvation, with justification covering the first step, while deification is the last step.
On this point, the case with justification is similar.
With justification, it may be harder to deal with the case of tiny children.
These are made more difficult by commentators who align the forensic with justification and the intrinsic with sanctification.
He also linked it with justification, as his commentary on 2 Peter 1:4, the locus classicus on divinization, makes clear: "We should notice that it is the purpose of the Gospel to make us sooner or later like God; indeed, it is, so to speak, a kind of deification.
It isn't just that we don't call it knowledge if it isn't true; if we believe with justification under normal conditions, truth and knowledge ineluctably follow.
As with justifications claimed by private fiduciaries, this legal
Consequently, even if we are prepared to accept the strong version of political obligation, I think that criminal law theorists who equate justifications of morality with justifications of criminal law must be understood to be referring to what morality commands or permits as a pre-legal matter.
But, as I've just noted, Davidson's model equally commits him to an identification of justifications for intending to do A with justifications for doing A.